Laurie Maitland slams Kathy Redfern


Sad thing was Kathy Redfern wouldn't sing on the record of 10cc's "I'm Not in Love", because her voice wouldn't carry a note. She would never learn to sing on records. That's why her voice was weak and shy due to too much whispering. A reward she didn't deserve.




 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kathy Redfern: The Most Annoying Person

Image
I never like Kathy Redfern, because was an idiot ruining the midsection of 10cc's serious pop ballad, "I'm Not in Love" by telling Eric Stewart to be quiet in a disruptive manner for no reason at all and started to annoy that midsection with her stupid, annoying, repulsive, distracting big-boys-don't-cry interlude to cause an outrageous commotion that spoiled up the song like this: I cannot stand that racket going: Big boys don't cry Big boys don't cry Big boys don't cry Big boys don't cry Big boys don't cry Big boys don't cry 'cause it's way too much, that ruined the heartfelt tune. I don't like it. I hate it. Believe me, that's not part of the song; it's way out of line and it's out of the question. Like I said before, I cannot stand her annoying female voice repeating: Big boys don't cry Big boys don't cry Big boys don't cry Big boys don't cry Big boys don't cry Big boys don't cry to make t...
Read more

Why 10cc's 1975 pop hit, "I'm Not in Love" should have been a serious pop ballad, minus Kathy Redfern's negative middle part instead of a joke song with her middle part added that made that song a mess

Image
 "I'm Not in Love",  done by British pop band 10cc,  is a powerful song that conveys strong emotions, and the addition of Kathy Redfern 's negative middle part detracts from the overall impact of the song. The lyrics and melody are strong enough to stand on their own, and without that middle part, the song would have been a much more powerful and meaningful ballad. By removing the joke element and allowing the song to stand as a serious pop ballad, the impact of the lyrics and melody would have been much more profound.
Read more